A clean, well-lit place to vent

Please feel free to contribute to this frequently-updated forum, which posts selected commentary on our favorite comic strip. If you’d like your critique to be posted, please note that civility, if not approbation, counts. Click here to submit a comment.

J.B. | Cambridge, UK | November 04, 2011

Loved the punchline to today's strip. I recall going to a college garden party in about 2006, and I fell into conversation with the college's bursar, a rather peppery retired major. Somehow the subject of the war came up. I was in my early twenties, so when the bursar demanded to know what I thought of the Iraq war, I was rather intimidated. However, I didn't wish to lie, so I said bluntly, "I think it was a hare-brained military adventure we went into under false pretences, and we really shouldn't have done so." To which he replied "Damn right!" and proceeded to tell us, at length, how disquieted much of the Army brass was by the whole thing. Moral: don't assume that all military men are gung-ho hawks -- and equally, don't assume that people who don't support particular wars therefore don't support the troops.

Peg | Providence, RI | November 04, 2011

Oh, nice. Just plain nice: spin and counter-spin. Yesterday you remind us that it's painful for vets to face the many bitterly reactionary liberal profs who do, indeed, exist. Then spinning it back to a prof who's a vet himself, from "their" arena? Oh, so nice. I am looking forward to something complex, nuanced, and subtle. Unlike our mainstream media news....

David Boyce | Thompson, CANADA | November 04, 2011

For the past forty years this has been the only real way for Canadians to understand American current events -- and history. Thank you.

Richard | Olympia, WA | November 03, 2011

Revisionist history. I too, had a rude reality check. I was back, in college, hanging at the library. I saw a kid come in, pick up a glossy rag on Viet Nam, and start thumbing through it. I couldn't help myself. I said, "I was there, you know. Three years of everything from Shore Patrol to Public Affairs." He looked at me, kinda funny, like I had interrupted his train of thought, and said, "S'okay. I can get all I need from this book here." And I thought to myself, "You can lead a horse..." Excellent portrait of Ray and BD. Excellent point on the sitting duck. Been there, too.

A.K. Dogman | Anchorage, ALASKA | November 03, 2011

It is nice to see Doonesbury admitting that some college professors are radical liberals who would never be in the military.

p.s. Alaska has more military personnel (active and Veterans) per capita than any other state, and as such are pro-military. Tomorrow in Anchorage the military is having a "stand down" where veterans who are street people can get help with their problems. This is supported by the state, the city, local businesses and the general population. I have volunteered to transport Veterans to various events.

Ray Lampe | Templeton, MA | November 03, 2011

Today's strip really hit me hard, as it peeled back the edge of the "cover" that fragile vets work with, trying to cope. We also see it in our beloved demented. This was a master touch of subtlety. I'm pretty tuned in to it, as my name is Ray and I lost my wife to dementia.

Richard | Olympia, WA | November 02, 2011

Let Ray pay the rent. He needs to feel entitled to respect as a valuable member of; society, veterans, family. So what if he's a little off on his math (and thereby, his reality) right now? He's back, he's alive, and he's trying. Go, Ray, go!

Al | North Eastham, MA | October 31, 2011

I just read the most recent comments about Toggle. PTSD (got mine in Nam) is a life-controlling disease. The best you can do is learn to live with it. Thanks for a sensitive and touching approach to it in both the younger (Toggle) and older (B.D. and Ray) vets. You've probably done more for us than all the drugs and shrinks at the VA (tho they really try).

Jesse Baker | Pound, VA | October 30, 2011

Today's strip includes the infamous straw man that the Republicans and the right love to throw out to justify refusing any attempts at health care reform: the old "ER" excuse. Let's ignore the fact that ERs do charge people (often $1000 for something minor). And worse, if you go in and they find out that you have a serious medical condition that needs long term care, you are SOL in that they will only give you basic, bare minimum treatment and reject you if you need bone marrow or a new organ or have cancer that needs extensive treatment, such as chemo and surgery to remove said tumor. I know several people who refuse to go to the emergency room when sick because their financial situation is so dire that a trip to the ER can pretty much bring them to the brink of financial ruin, given how much hospital ERs charge people for treatment. And god help you if you are so sick that you have to spend 3-4 days in the hospital.

Jack Cerf | Chatham, NJ | October 30, 2011

What the baghead implies is that the bohemian left aren't serious people willing to do the retail work of translating outrage into electoral power. Hendrik Hertzberg, as left liberal as you could ask for, says something similar in this week's New Yorker: "The Tea Party is simply better adapted to — and, despite its angry face, less alienated from — the actually existing environment of American politics and government. Its purported fear of coöption didn’t stop it from accepting millions of dollars (and offers of “training”) from Astroturf outfits like the Koch brothers’ Americans for Prosperity and Dick Armey’s FreedomWorks, while Fox News and talk radio provided it with a ready-made apparatus for organizing and propaganda. The Tea Party has never doubted the efficacy of elections; it has focussed on officeholders and would-be officeholders all along. The paradigmatic Tea Party activity, in the summer of 2009, was to pack a local congressman’s town hall and shout imprecations against Obamacare. By 2010 it was all electoral politics, all the time." We've seen the result.

Pat Goudey O'Brien | Warren, CT | October 30, 2011

Dishwashers are only appropriate for the well-to-do. The poor should not have them, not even if they're ancient. (Dishwashers have been around for a long time, like refrigerators, which the poor also have, lucky them.)

Chris Campbell | Overland Park, KS | October 30, 2011

Please, Roland, allow me to respond to your "Fox editorial." To quote you, "This is America." We are (or were) the wealthiest nation in the world. Poverty may be unstoppable, but America has no excuse for not availing its poor of every resource with which the poor themselves can survive in the artificial environment that is America, and perhaps even become non-poor taxpayers. Indeed the poor themselves are a resource we cannot afford to squander. We are quite a different society from many others. In some countries, the poor might be able to get by with a few seeds, a hoe, a good well, and a lot of luck, but in the America we have built, the poor are SOL if they are deprived of such "luxuries" as good jobs, nutritious food, modern communications, modern transportation, medical care, and education. Take those things away and this is no longer America, it's the Third World. And believe me, Roland, we do have pockets of Third World right here at home. Is that really the way you would prefer to keep your poor?

A. Harrison | Colchester, CT | October 30, 2011

Thanks for today's reality check.

Mary | San Francisco, cA | October 30, 2011

Today's strip had me until the final square. I was hoping GBT, Mike or Kim would have a verbal and intelligent response to the attack on the poor, not to mention the increasingly poor and struggling middle class. Poverty isn't funny. Neither is obesity. Least of all is Roland. Nice try.

Brian Harvey | Berkeley, CA | October 30, 2011

Re today's strip: Are you and Tom Tomorrow collaborating?

Marcia M. | Eric, CO | October 30, 2011

In today's strip, Roland isn't nearly over-the-top enough. His dialog sounds exactly like the real-time online comments in the Washington Post. This isn't satire, it's reality comics.

David Douglas | Chicago, IL | October 30, 2011

Today's strip really hurt. They usually do because you often lay bare the truth of current events, but usually it is accompanied by some comment that makes it really clear you're being ironic, and that was absent today. Some people reading today's strip might think you are in agreement with Roland Hedley.

Scott Dietsci | Staten Island, NY | October 29, 2011

Ha! The return of egg freckles! Welcome back to our favorite phrase of misunderstanding!

S. Perrault | Sacramento, CA | October 29, 2011

The return of "egg freckles"! Nicely done.

White Male | Woodcrest, MD | October 29, 2011

Having the bag-headed kid be a white guy is not a bad thing. Not that he's representative of America today demographically, merely that white guys have no baggage attached to them. When white guys are the main characters in the movies, you can't complain about some minority being misrepresented. White males represent nobody. They're a blank slate. If a white guy character is a scumbag, no white male advocacy network is going to come out of the woodwork to fire off angry letters about how their people are being abused in the public media.