Terry D. McGee | Sydney, AUSTRALIA | September 07, 2015
People have fallen into Trudeau's trap on Sunday's strip. The "Dean" in "Dean just arrived" is not "the Dean", but "Dean" (as in James) -- an Assistant Extras Casting Agent for a movie (or commercial) being shot on Walden campus. This is why he only cares that they "look smart enough." The reveal is in the last panel when he says "I also need a professor-type for a student film!" Don't feel bad if you were tricked -- an Oxford University Phd with honours friend of mine was also misled by Trudeau, and started to analyse what's wrong with Higher Ed in 2015 until I told him that "Dean" himself was also only hired by the day; that's how business has gone. In the end everything becomes like a movie set.
TRYING TO DECIDE
Linda Welling | Victoria, CANADA | September 07, 2015
Re Sunday's strip, I'm trying to decide what to make of the hiring of two middle-aged males for the positions. I wonder if "looking smart enough" to be professors still means being male. Or if more males than females are adjuncts. Or maybe it's too much to address more than one issue at a time...
Cameron Russell | Norfolk, VA | September 07, 2015
Thank you for illustrating the plight of adjuncts today. With reduced enrollment around the nation, many adjuncts are being "cast aside" when, in the case of our community college, they made up over 60% of our teaching faculty two years ago. Our community college is now concentrating on efficiency (number of students per instructor), and it is trying to institute a corporate model like the for-profit schools. College is supposed to be about learning, not numbers (except in math classes).
David Ferrier | Edmonton, CANADA | September 07, 2015
Thanks for Sunday's adjunct professor strip. It describes the way I was treated as a computer professional with 30 years experience while working as a "contractor." Bad hours, bad offices, bad ambience. The old story of management by meatheads.
Melissa G. | Charlotte, NC | September 06, 2015
Thanks so much for the spot-on comic today. I couldn't stop laughing because sadly, you nailed it. Adjunct professors today are the corner migrants of yesterday.
FAR TOO TRUE
Dan O'Rourke | Wooster, OH | September 06, 2015
Mr. Trudeau, I thoroughly, sadly, enjoyed your Sunday September 6th cartoon. It is far too true and very much the situation at the University where I am employed. Thank you for bringing the issue to the attention of others so humorously.
TRUE TO LIFE
Big Guy | New York, NY | September 06, 2015
Today's strip is true to life about how adjuncts are treated. Thank you. Here in NYC, CUNY pays the most; NYU and Columbia the least. The more prestigious the school, the less the pay. In fact, NYU and Columbia Law and Business schools "strongly encourage" their adjuncts to donate their pay back to the schools.
Lobo Bielich | Key Biscayne, FL | September 04, 2015
The August 31 strip, a Classic from 1985, may give us a clue to the origin of Jeff's fantasy world. If Rick had no time for him, it is no wonder the kid had to create a parallel universe...
WORLD OF DOONESBURY
Don Kuzenko | Eagle Lake, CANADA | September 03, 2015
Does there exist, or will there exist, an archive of all the strips? I would like to begin at the beginning and explore the entire World of Doonesbury.
Indeed there is, and yes you can. Bon voyage. Start here.
Sandra M. | Indianapolis, IN | September 02, 2015
More GBT "Easter eggs" in today's Classic strip; In Rick's wastebasket it's panda, panda, panda, bunny!
Steve Lang | Concord, MA | August 30, 2015
I enjoyed the taking-a-look-back-at-the-commune-days strip, though I had the impression that Sam was conceived when Boopsie and B.D. were living out in Malibu. Then again my memories are often wrong. Or maybe Boopsie's mythologized her past.
Shooshie | Dallas, TX | August 24, 2015
In the August 23 35-years-ago Flashback strip from... let's see... 1980, a Carter Administration official is testifying to the senate subcommittee about the Billy Carter affair known as "Billygate." After assuring the committee that there was no unethical connection between the president and his brother in regard to the affair, the witness turns on the committee and says frankly, "Frankly, Mr. Chairman, we're a little embarrassed for you. With all the problems this country is facing, a lot of people are wondering why nine US Senators have been devoting their full energies to such a trivial affair." The Senators realize the spotlight is on them, and make excuses.
It was funny then. Isn't it amazing how much can change in 35 years? Now, we'd be surprised if nine senators ever got together with the idea of doing something non-trivial. That investigation was just a premonition of a sea-change in congressional method and discourse. Now the norm is to obfuscate, delay, distract, and prevent any meaningful governmental processes from taking place, unless it happens to be a vote on a bill that dismantles significant constitutional protections or guarantees. In 2015, the joke would have fallen flat. But now it serves as a reminder of when this all began, who was doing it, and that once upon a time such congressional stupidity and shenanigans was not considered respectable politics.
Now, 35 years later, it's considered respectable to put an anti-science tea-bagger (Ted Cruz) in charge of the Senate Subcommittee on Space, Science, and Competitiveness where he controls funding for organizations like NASA, or to call a bill to put logging roads and loggers in a national forest to clearcut the trees beyond sight of tourist highways a "forest preservation bill." (Bush era) What has gone wrong with America to tolerate this insanity? Has the average American decided that politics is simply not their thing? Has it really become just a dog and pony show? Is anyone paying attention? Sorry, I have no comic relief with which to end this rant. Sometimes there's just no punch line... Trudeau always finds that strand of humanity where it appears all hope is lost, but I'm simply wondering where we're going. It's like one party got stuck at Billygate, and they haven't really moved on. And by the way... regarding last Sunday's Texas strip; the majority of thinking Texans are appalled at what has happened to our state. The voting districts have been drawn so that we can't fully express our dismay at the polls.
Hanna | Casselberry, FL | August 22, 2015
God bless you, Garry Trudeau, for last Sunday's strip. You were able to say with the needle of humor something that needs to be shouted from the rooftops.
Ralph | Houston, TX | August 16, 2015
Textbooks are only relevant if a school buys them, a teacher uses them, and the student reads them. Also, if the textbook is the primary teaching method in high school, the student is not getting the best education anyway. Modern teaching is driven by assessment, and the resources used must go beyond the textbook, in history to primary sources as shown in the comic. This is why conservatives were so freaked out about the AP US History exam.
Jifster | Carlisle, IN | August 16, 2015
Re OUR PAST: All attempts to improve our future will continue to fail until we truly understand and face the truth of our past.
SIGNS OF HOPE
Ed Cherlin | Columbus, IN | August 16, 2015
Re today's strip: The greatest sign of hope that I see in the U.S. is that children can no longer be raised entirely in the bubble, and that millions fall away from various delusions every year. Why, the Evangelical polling company (I know! Evidence, right?) Barna Group reported in 2013 that 38% of "practicing Christian Millennials" were fact-checking sermons on their smart phones. Also, check out these free digital textbooks. Did you know that some computers cost less than printed textbooks?
Bobby Padgett | Gastonia, NC | August 16, 2015
Since North Carolina has failed to replace textbooks since the Bush recession, cutting textbook budgets to nothing, teachers are expected to create their own teaching sources from the Internet. Yet, our Republican-controlled legislature would be quite happy with history as written in Texas to the point of forcing the Department of Public Instruction to create a course on the Founding Principles and American Exceptionalism to supplement post-Reconstruction U.S. History and threatening the College Board to revise the AP U.S. History curriculum to match. I can't wait for history to clash with their revisionism in classrooms this fall.
Terry D. McGee | Sydney, AUSTRALIA | August 16, 2015
It's possible that economic interests that wanted independence (and were possibly funding the effort?) saw slavery as a sideshow to them getting control, but a very useful public sideshow. "Follow the money."
David Kastrup | Waltrop, GERMANY | August 16, 2015
If an almighty creator can bury million-year-old bones in the Earth to test our faith in our teachers, burying a declaration of secession in our historical records should be simple in comparison. Our future is what we should focus on improving, not our past.